Can your students master four figure grid references to help Santa get ready for his busiest night of the year? This powerpoint and worksheet lesson explain how to work out four figure grid reference coordinates on a map. There are fully animated slides illustrating how to find out grid references and then test the class on their understanding.
Taylor some that none ever will, new curricula for teaching mathematics continually emerge, each with the hope of being the reform panacea for the myriad problems with public mathematics education. This results, in part, in a population of teachers with a reluctant reliance on their textbooks and a smattering of lesson plans, activities and assessments they adapted or created with little system or formal expertise.
Because the curriculum developers, educational researchers, mathematicians, politicians, school administrators, and teachers involved in mathematics education in this country arguably have the same goal — helping more students understand and be successful in mathematics — it is surprising how little progress has been made helping teachers use, adapt or write curricula more effectively, especially with alliances between these groups growing more and more common.
It is unclear how many focus on the kinds of curriculum assessment and adaptation that empower teachers to actively assess the likelihood their textbook will meet the needs of their students and then systematically adapt it if necessary.
Perhaps this is the case because no one process exists for helping teachers do this difficult and complex work. Perhaps this is complicated by a lack of confidence in teachers to learn how.
In this dissertation I take one step toward supporting a claim that the more deliberately and systematically mathematics teachers can interact with their curricula in planning and teaching, the more effective their planning and teaching will be.
Here, I hypothesize that mathematics teachers who have a doable way to interact more meaningfully with their curriculum may view the interaction more positively, regardless of the textbook or other curricular materials they start with, and may be more effective in meeting the needs of their students.
As one specific way to test this, I examine one form of curriculum interaction currently named the Mathematics Curriculum Assessment and Adaptation MCAA process that a classroom teacher and I developed for use in the mathematics classroom, independent of the subject or given textbook.
Taylor mathematics curricula and empowers them to make planning choices that follow from thoughtful, on-going, curricular analysis. The primary question I explore is: This is problematic when considering teachers are the mechanisms 6 Megan W. Taylor in current U.
This perspective, supported in a wide swath of curriculum literature from the past century, treats curriculum-making as essentially the hunt for the best container, that once found will be the vessel with which to give a wide range of students access to content learning and that is largely teacherindependent.
Research tells us, however, that no perfect curriculum container yet exists. Without teachers actively analyzing and attending to their given curricula to realize their maximum potentials, they may not be teaching what they want to be teaching.
Zumwalt might add the need for a teacher to have a comprehensive, long-term view of the curriculum, its purpose, and its place within the larger contexts of the department and school, or what she calls a curriculum vision Packaged curricula are more useful and complex, potentially, than outlined in their learning objectives or title-page mission statement.
One Pole of Curriculum Use: Taylor make it especially difficult for teachers to enact this valued autonomy. She reports research finding that mathematics teachers view these non-teacher-created textbooks as authoritative, inflexible and, especially when linked to state standards, having more weight than their own beliefs about what students should learn.
These messages include that curriculum developers possess valid knowledge and expertise that was used to write the textbook and that there may not be additional themes and principles of importance beyond what the textbook authors have included.
In California, for example, this message is emphasized by the fact that state-approved mathematics textbooks are written to specifically address the state standards to which teachers and students are held accountable on the high-stakes tests given each May CDE, Taylor directly address the standards tested on high-stakes state and national exams.
This disconnect between what teachers believe about textbook use and how they are expected to use textbooks may also contribute to the wide array of mathematics curriculum use practices.
Remillard discusses the various ways research defines and examines textbook use, from mathematics teachers simply subverting or following the textbook the positivistic stance to teachers actively interpreting or participating with a given text.
Nonuse — State in which the user has little or no knowledge of the innovation and has no involvement with it 1: Orientation — State in which the user has recently acquired or is acquiring information about the innovation 2: Preparation — State in which the user is preparing for first use of the innovation 3: Mechanical Use — State in which the user focuses most effort on the short-term, day-to-day use of the innovation with little time for reflection 4a: Routine — Use of the innovation is stabilized.Using Rubrics to Measure and.
Enhance Student Performance. Sharon Karkehabadi, srmvision.com Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College. Why Use a Rubric? What do you think?? Test Scores and Grades: Monitor Learning.
Promote Learning Rubrics reveal how students’ work. How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. What Are Rubrics and Why Are They Important?
The word rubric comes from the Latin word for red. The tasks all have to be instances of the same learning outcome—for example, writing or mathematics problem solving. The criteria point to aspects of the learning .
Eberly Center › Assess Teaching & Learning › Assessing Student Learning › Creating and Using Rubrics Anthropology Writing Assignments This rubric was designed for a series of short writing assignments in anthropology Levels of Program Assessment Level 1: Learning Objectives Level 2: Program-level Outcomes Level 3: Curriculum .
Zeker weten? H.H. Schalk Literatuur Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (b). The place of investigations in practical work in the UK National Curriculum for Science.
Relation between team motivation, enjoyment, and cooperation and learning results in learning area based on team- based learning among students of Tehran University of medical science. Proc. Social and Behavioral Sciences, Save Santa this Christmas!
4 figure grid reference map skills geography lesson; Back to Product Catalogue. Resource Rating. Save Santa this Christmas! 4 figure grid reference map skills geography lesson Seller: Mshughesteaches.
HERTS, United K More From This Teacher >.