Email Advertisement Computers — to most of us — are a relatively simple machines to purchase, operate, and for the most part understand. Windows computers have a built-in defragmentation utility that automatically runs in the background, on a pre-defined schedule. Should you buy one? While hard drive size, RAM capacity, and CPU speed have grown almost exponentially, the spinning speed of a hard drive,
May 15, The article is all about what David Gelernter thinks on how the computers affect the classroom set up. According to him, they have the ability to help students in a variety of ways if used in the appropriate manner. However, they could also be a disaster if utilized in the wrong manner.
Gelernter has put forward three arguments that work towards discouraging the use of computers in schools. The first argument is that it results in the reduction of literacy levels among students.
The overuse of the computer may be associated with lowering the abilities such as math skills of its users. The author David Gelernter in this article Unplugged: The Myth of computers in the classroom believes so and has several supporting facts to back his beliefs.4/4(1). In the article “ The Myth of Computer in the Classroom”, the author believes that computer in the classroom can be helpful if people use it in the right way. However, it could be a disaster if. And Gelernter agrees that “Computers should be in the schools. ”() Using the right software, computers have the power to attain a rewarding learning experience. Computers and the internet have changed the world of education in numerable ways. Gelernter explains how computers in the schools can be a negative source, when it comes to learning.
According to him, computers tend to reduce cogency of public debate, dismiss linear argument and promote shallow romps when it comes to the information landscape Muller Gelernter uses multimedia as an The myth of computers in the to support his argument.
Its function is to combine picture, sound and text in a single package. Instead of students having to read books, they watch them being performed on screens by varied actors. Such experiences make the books seem boring in the eyes of students, and they no longer want to read them.
He compares their appearance to that of a dusty piano presented to a teenager that already owns a Walkman Muller Gelernter second argument is on the effect of reading skills. He uses hypermedia as an example to elaborate his argument. Hypermedia entails the aspect of converting a book into a hypertext that is displayed on the screen.
It has the effect of making readers concentrate on the words as opposed to the story. The problem here is that students will understand varies details entailed in a piece of writing, but will not understand the main purpose of the writing or the main points Muller These are programs that help students check grammar and spelling mistakes and fix them automatically.
He also argues that things like calculators should be banned at some levels of schooling. According to Gelernter, such programs only hinder students from improving their basic skills. I disagree with most arguments in this article because Gelernter has used several fallacies in an attempt of trying to argue his ideas.
Among the fallacies used is the broad generalization. This aspect is vivid whereby he assumes that use of computers in classrooms tends to affect all students in the same way. This is not true since students have been programmed to respond differently when subjected to a similar stimulus based on various biological and other reasons.
The effect of these programs goes beyond this since there are other areas that they might help students positively like time-saving so that they can concentrate on developing other relevant skills. Gelernter has also used a hasty generalization in his argument on why Japanese students are better than American students when it comes to mathematics.
It is not true to claim that the use of calculators in junior high school is the only reason behind this. There students who have passed through this curriculum and they are very good with mathematics.
There is also a usage of dictor simpliciter fallacy by the author. This is where he argues that due to the negative effects that computers have on students, they should only be used during relaxation or recess periods.
Gelernter also uses a slippery slope fallacy. This is when he asserts that not knowing how to correct spelling mistakes makes one a semi literate.
It is like asserting that a single event will result in a catastrophe.
In conclusion, I liked the article. I agree with the premise that computers in classrooms could be good or bad to students based on how they are used. This is because of the many fallacies used in his arguments as I have elaborated in the paragraph above.
Work Cited Muller, Gilbert H. Issues across the Disciplines.David Gelernter's Opinion Against the Idea of Computers in the Classroom in His Essay Unplugged: The Myth of Computers. In the article “The Myth of Computer in The Classroom”.
Author David Gelernter believes that computer in the classroom can be helpful if people use it in the right way; however, it could be a disaster if people use it in the wrong way.
Gelernter claimed three issues for /5(1). In the article “The Myth of Computer in The Classroom”. Author David Gelernter believes that computer in the classroom can be helpful if people use it in the right way; however, it could be a disaster if people use it in the wrong way.
Gelernter claimed three issues for put computer in school. First is /5(1). The E-Myth Revisited: Why Most Small Businesses Don't Work and What to Do About It [Michael E. Gerber] on srmvision.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In this first new and totally revised edition of the , copy underground bestseller, The E-Myth.
In the article “ The Myth of Computer in the Classroom”, the author believes that computer in the classroom can be helpful if people use it in the right way. However, it could be a disaster if. English W (R.D.) January 30, A Critique on “Unplugged: The Myth of Computers in the Classroom” David Gelernter is a professor of computer science at Yale University.